Plans are in the works for a summer vaccation, and so the question of trip insurance came up. Now since I’ve taught graduate research methods courses and play poker with a vengance, to my mind this is actually a fascinating, rant-worthy issue. I also figure that I should do a bit more to live up to the blog’s name of “prod and ponder”. So here’s my provocative statement:
Insurance is for suckers.
(more accurately: many forms of insurance are a sucker’s wager, though some are vital… but that’s less enticing as a remark)
People look at large casinos and go “my, look at all the stupidity that feeds those companies,” and yet they rarely pose that same scrutiny at insurance companies and their customers. And yet, much insurance is nothing other than a very bad (negative expectied utility/value) wager. It’s a profit making venture where the insurance company calculates odds in favor of them making profit–sound a bit like the casinos? Essentially, taking insurance is often akin to sitting at a very high stakes blackjack table, though usually with even worse odds.
It only makes sense when… 1. The law requires it, 2. You have a positive expected utility (which insurance companies stay in business by not providing), 3. When you’re already involved with a policy and the law requires an insurer to keep you on even though you’re a money loser for them (health insurance), or 4. When a loss, though unlikely, would equal financial ruin. There’s a whole poker-oriented stats lecture in that last point about financial ruin, the difference of betting “all in” at a tournament–where out means “game over!”–versus a no limit table where your entire bankroll isn’t at risk and you can buy back in when you get “unlucky”.
It would seem to be far more profitable for consumers to offer calamity insurance–insure what would be a crushing financial loss for an individual or family (an amount which would vary by their income & monthly expenses) and for everything else have the family invest in an “emergency fund”.
The problem with insuring relatively minor costs (doctors visits, fender benders, missing a trip, etc.) is that
a) You are betting against the odds in each of your insurance deals.
b) The money you ‘invest’ in insurance isn’t fungible. i.e. You can’t take money put in insuring your car into medical costs if it turns out that’s where you run into problems.
Sadly, I don’t think that’s a financial service that’s going to be offered anytime soon. People make all sorts of irrational decisions. Vegas doesn’t make its money by offering “better wagers”, it makes money by encouraging and exploiting bad decisions born out of consumers’ irrational hopes and fears, and there’s little reason to expect insurance companies to behave any differently.
(note: my hope isn’t that folks go out and drop insurance policies, just that they choose their wagers with a bit more critical thought.)
—-
Since you waded through all that musing and ranting, without any pictures, here’s a bonus nugget…
Perhaps the best use of the web, ever: the official ninja webpage