a day at the baseball game (in comic form)
Here’s a comic-ified version of my latest outing to a Nats game (the last game in a three-game sweep of the Cubs).
I made the remark in the comic that, despite the improvements with new team ownership, the stands are still too empty. Someone on flickr remarked that the problem was RFK, and I gave the following reply:
I’ve always supported building a new stadium, but I think you’re wrong to blame the low attendance on RFK.
1. Attendance has taken a dramatic fall this year, and the stadium isn’t anything new in the equation.
2. If anything, the fan experience at RFK has improved since last year. While food concessions still leaves a lot to be desired (understatement), it’s better than it was opening year, even before the food court addition two weeks ago. Metro has also gotten better at handling game day traffic.
While RFK is showing its age and it is not baseball-focused in design, it also has some nice benefits. It’s certainly a democratic stadium: there may be no great seating, but there’s also very little terrible seating–the cheap seats are still pretty darn good.
Again, don’t get me wrong, I support a new stadium. RFK’s geographic location means that we can’t get any good development around it, and that means a huge amount of tourist revenue is lost because there’s no place for fans to go before and after the game. And fans lose out on that fun as well. RFK doesn’t have, and could never have, the equivalent of Wrigleyville built around it.
In contrast, the new stadium location will allow for a new region of economic development for the city and more entertainment options for fans. Those before and after-game entertainment options will also help spread out fan travel plans, giving the metro a bit less of a rider crush.
Also, the democratic seating at RFK makes it less desirable for team owners. RFK doesn’t have the luxury seating and more sharply divided class tiers in seating that helps make a stadium profitable for owners. It’s hard to imagine MLB ever opting for a new franchise in a city that only gave them an RFK-type stadium to work with.
If you ask me, three things are to blame for the lower attendance:
1. The honeymoon of the inaugural season has passed.
2. Recent win streak aside, the Nats have had a poor season.
3. The Comcast/MASN feud that has made it nearly impossible to catch live games on television, taking away a major hook and marketing tool for a new team.
Personally, I put a lot of blame for the lower attendance on the Comcast/MASN feud. Most of the ire I hear over the dispute is directed at Angelos, but I think MLB deserves its fair share of the criticism. When you give a monopoly to a party with conflicts of interests against those served, this kind of travesty is predictable.






(38-49) — wins are up ticks, losses down, and it gives a quick visual reference for trends. (By the way, you should follow the Sparkline link above, since my baseball example doesn’t do the idea justice.)